Crusader wrote:
...
Interesting to see the different philosophies ... the Germans pushed out many chronographs to their pilots, the allies resorted to mass-produced and reasonably (though not superbly) accurate A-11s and 6B/159 basic watches.
This might well reflect different approaches in general.
What I was taught was that the Italian equipment was very good, but artisan, so hard to maintain and hard to produce. The German equipment (at least the best of it) was very good, but there really wasn't enough of it. (For example, the German army was still mostly a horse/mule drawn army in WWII.) The British used mostly US stuff, but needed some eccentric equipment, which was, well, eccentric. (This is later. Earlier is a different story.) The US stuff was pretty crummy, but there was a lot of it. (Although the M1 doesn't seem a bad weapon.) And the Russians used lots of US stuff, but not always. E.g., possibly, the Russian T34 had the best tank design of them all. (And there were lots and lots of them.)
Best wishes,
Bob