
shaggy wrote:b**tards!
did the recipient sign for it then?

pulga69 wrote:shaggy wrote:b**tards!
did the recipient sign for it then?
Unfortunately...his wife didn't really know what she was signing for...
_
_
_
_
_


Chris_in_the_UK wrote:pulga69 wrote:shaggy wrote:b**tards!
did the recipient sign for it then?
Unfortunately...his wife didn't really know what she was signing for...
This is bad, very bad.
I suspect RM will take the stance that the delivery was signed for and they have no indication that it had been tampered with at the time of signature

pulga69 wrote:shaggy wrote:b**tards!
did the recipient sign for it then?
Unfortunately...his wife didn't really know what she was signing for...




seikopath wrote:if the outer envelope was badly ripped on delivery then your posty would remember this and may corroborate your claim

I have also thought of that but what can I do ?? do I return all payment and risk not getting anything back, go halves, blame the other person ? a real crappy choice in any case...




Users browsing this forum: jedly1, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, sangman, seikomatic, siddhartha, Yahoo [Bot] and 28 guests